Putnam County Republican Party

A Voice of Leadership

The items displayed and linked on this page constitute opinions.  They do not necessarily  reflect the opinions of the
Putnam County Republican Party or its members. They are about subjects related to Putnam County and are placed here
 as a courtesy to interested citizens. 

Commentary

 

August 25, 2010

Dear Editors:

Your August 19th edition included an article about a recent Eatonton council meeting during which comments were made by a councilman and the mayor about ballot questions appearing on the Republican ballot for the recent primary election. I was surprised to learn that Councilman Jim Hall thought it was a “disgrace” he and “other GOP elected officials on council” weren’t consulted about the questions.

Georgia law allows political parties to put questions on their party’s ballot. Those questions were suggested by the members and governing body of the Putnam County Republican Party (PCRP), and I freely acknowledge it never occurred to us to run the ballot questions by council.. Mr. Hall has never been a PCRP member, has never applied for PCRP membership or attended a PCRP function.  While he may, as he said, be a Republican, council seats are non-partisan and, given his lack of interest in the local GOP, how would we know?  Why would he think the local GOP should “approach” people with no connection to the local GOP about its potential ballot questions? 

If he took a GOP ballot in the primary, Mr. Hall had the opportunity to voice an opinion about these important issues, so what’s his real complaint? He said our consolidation question was “loaded,” so apparently he would have preferred a different slant to that question. Our question reflected the view of all PCRP members - including all local elected officials on the 2008 GOP ballot - who expressed an opinion about that question.

Or maybe Mr. Hall would have preferred that we ignore the consolidation issue altogether. The mayor said no one on council would even “entertain” consolidation. He said consolidation won’t benefit Putnam residents who live within the city limits, but what is his position based on?  Consolidation of Putnam County’s two governments will save money by reducing the size of government and eliminating duplication of taxpayer-funded services. More than 74% of voters taking a GOP ballot, some of whom are city residents, favor looking into consolidation.

Commissioner Foster expressed the appropriate attitude for an elected official - listen to the voters and consider their opinions.  In these tough economic times, taxpayers shouldn’t be denied a chance to reduce the cost of government just because some public officials may worry about the effect of consolidation on themselves.  Now that would be a “disgrace.”

Dorothy J. Adams

Chairman, Putnam County Republican Party

 

=====================================================

      

=======================================================